US and California Compared

The linked States Census is taken every ten age in differentiate for the U. S. government to count exactly how to a greater extent mint live in the country to the best of its abilities. Aside from taking the population, the count asks many different questions, much(prenominal) as the age of the persons living in a assumption menage, their race and ethnicity, the languages that are talk at seat, their educational attainment level, and family income. These questions, when answered by the entire population, provide the government a sense of the news subject publisher and the needs of its people.Without this information, world services such as education, hospitals, health care, and well-disposed security can non be provided to all in need and on that pointfore it is grave data that deserves our careful exami press out of matter. For my term paper, I have decided to analyze the data of the state of calcium to the coupled States of America to discover how connatural or different the sets of data whitethorn be. I would predict close to of these data to be similar, such as age distri scarcelyion, due to the incident that calcium is a comparatively bighearted state with a large enough population that it would serve as a pretty total sample of the entire nation.However, I would expect to see deviations in accompanimentors such as race and ethnicity and the languages spoken at home, because atomic number 20 has a comparatively larger Hispanic and Asiatic population than most other states in the US. Also, the income level of calcium will be slightly higher(prenominal) than the nation due to the existence of twain large metropolitan cities in the state. The paper takes a careful look at the various socio-demo interpretic multivariates that are taken by the linked States Census in order to compare the state of atomic number 20 to the nation as a whole.The first obvious bill in my analysis is to look at both populations counted by the 1990 United States census. The population of the United States is estimated to be 248,709,873 and calcium is estimated to be 29,760,021. This data is of import to this paper because when making equalitys amid the two geo chartic locations, I will use percentages taken from the actual data given in the census divided by the total populations. This way, the comparisons are scaled in carnal knowledge to one another and it is easier to analyze and to make comparisons. The first demographic variable that I will examine is the age distri hardlyion between the two areas.The age distri saveion given by the population age pyramid (Graph 1) show that both are kinda similar, with a pyramid-like shape commencement from age 25 to 80+, with the large base of the pyramid scratch line at age 25. From age 0 to 24, there is an overall tapering in from the base of the pyramid above as the ages decrease, indicating a fewer make sense of people aged 0 through 24. It means that the largest cast of persons in both regions is between the ages of 25 and 34 in 1990. This imp lies that there were a larger number of births in the 1950s and 1960s than in the 1970s and 1980s.This phenomenon can be explained by the fact that the baby-boom children had reached generative stagecoach in their lives and gave birth to many babies in the 50s and 60s. There is also relatively fewer people aged 45 to 80+. The upper qualify upper region of the graph, ages 65 and up, can be explained by the fact that the life expectancy in the United States is around 70 years old and it is natural to see a tapering off of the population at these ages. However, the age group from 45 to 64 is also quite narrow. This is most likely due to the fact that these are the people who fought in World War II.Looking at the graph, the only noticeable difference between the two regions is that California has a relatively fewer number of people aged 10 through 19. This could be due to many economic, social, and physical fa ctors in the 1970s that affected California births, but not the entire nation. I would predict that since children of the baby-boomers (ages 25 to 34) have now reached reproductive stage, the census 2000 would show that the base of the graph would continue to grow a little bit wider, from babies being born in the 1990s. The second demographic variable I will focus on is the racial slice of California and the United States.Graph 2 shows the percentages of the total population, which fall nether the five racial categories 1. exsanguinous 2. obscure 3. American Indian, Eskimo, or Aleut 4. Asian or Pacific Islander and 5. Other. It is important to note that people of Hispanic origin are mainly categorized as either ashen or Other, depending on how each individual has chosen to categorize him or herself. The family unit, Other, also include people who are mixed, such as Mulatto, Creole, and Mestizo. The segmentation of the races are pretty similar, as can be seen by the graph with Whites being the overwhelming absolute majority of the total population for both regions.However, it may be interesting to note that the origins of the people who make up the White family unit for the two regions may be quite different. For the United States, the composition of the people who make up the White category are in the main of European origin. The origin of people who make up the White category for California also include many people of European origin, but also many of Hispanic origin. This is due to the fact that California shares the marge with Mexico and therefore would have a larger Mexican or Latino population.Also due to the large Mexican and Latino population, the Other category for California is almost 10% larger than for the United States. The lower Black population in California can be attributed to the fact that the majority of Blacks in this country are concentrated in the southern states of the US, such as Alabama, raising the composition for the nat ion, but not for California. Lastly, the Asian and Pacific Islander category is almost 8% higher in California because many Asians tend to be concentrated on the west semivowel of the US. The third socio-demographic variable I will examine is language spoken at home.The first thing to note on Graph 3 is that English is spoken in the majority of homes both in California and the United States. The population speaking languages other than English at home is higher in California due to the racial composition examined above. The higher Asian/Pacific Islander and Latino concentration has raised this California percentage to twice that of the US. Of these other languages, the existence of Spanish spoken in homes is more(prenominal) than 10 percent higher in California than in the rest of the nation. Subsequently, the English at home contingent will be smaller in percentage comparison for California.This type of data is highly important to the government because it raises issues such as t he appropriateness of ESL programs, bilingual education, and habitual services that must be provided to the public in many languages. study two different regions such as California and the US may seem useless due to the similar data, but it is differences such as these that make the census crucial data that deserve our careful analysis. educational Attainment is another variable I will analyze between the two regions. Graph 4 reveals that in the US, highschool graduates (including equivalency) make up the highest percentage of education attained.This is not surprising because formal education in the US is required for all children until the age of 14 through 18, depending on the state, and therefore it is expected that most children would finish high school. In California, people attending any(prenominal) college without obtaining a degree make up the highest percentage. This implies that Californias students have a tendency to pursue their education progress than the theme stud ent. The higher percentage of Californians attending some college can be attributed to the proliferation of junior colleges in the state.The concern for California should lie in the fact that a higher percentage of children do not progress beyond the ninth grade than in the nation. This may be attributed to the large Spanish speaking population who are cushioned in schools by bilingual teachers during their elementary and secondary schooling years but are left to themselves in non-bilingual high schools to survive on their give and as a result, drop out. Finally, the comparison of household income between California and the US shows that income levels for both regions are concentrated under $60,000 per year (Graph 5).In analyzing these data, I have taken the income data from the census and divided that systema skeletale with the total number of households, not the population, so that a direct comparison between the income of each households would be thinkable. In general, Califor nians have higher income than the US as a whole. The 1990 Census shows that the median household income of California is $35,798. This class is higher than the national median household income of $30,056. The data on the graph shows that the higher percentage of Californians earn incomes higher than $30,000.The higher income in California can be attributed to the two metropolitan areas of Los Angeles and San Francisco as mentioned earlier and additionally, to the youthful boom of the computer and internet industry in Silicon Valley, which has increase the number of Californians earning higher wages. The different variables examined in this paper have revealed several(prenominal) demographic trends between California and the US as a whole. speckle the two regions share similar demographic profiles, several differences arise upon nearer analysis of the data. Generally, California has a higher concentration of racial minorities.Thus, more families speak languages other than English at home. The data also shows that a higher percentage of Californians pursue degrees in higher education than the national percentage. Since college graduatess and advanced degree holders tend to earn higher wages, the data for household income is consistent with the previous observation as more Californians are in the higher income bracket. It can then be concluded that California is more racially diverse than most other states, and that Californians tend to do break in economically than the rest of the nation.This type of analysis would not have been possible without the United States Census, which I believe is an important tool that allows researchers to do their feature analysis with the hard data that it provides. The different conclusions I have wasted from this paper clearly indicate a need for different public programs that are specifically designed for each individual state because the United States is not made up of a homogeneous group of people, but is composed of an exremely diverse group of individuals.