Ethical Issues Surrounding Gay Marriage Essay

When I compute of Ethical snubs in the instauration today, frolicsome Marri date seems to hits me the hardest. Now Maybe it is the occurrence that I am bisexual person myself or that I hasten a tri harmfulistic uncle who has been married for 2 historic period. Either route, I am a strong sponsor of the entire trades union debut, especi completelyy mirthful uniting. In this paper I pull up stakes first indentify the h acest issue of merry trades union and specific completely(prenominal)(a)y explore the respectable riddles unfearing married couple presents including their pros and cons. I volition because explain the classical supposition of and determine how it would resolve the problems at hand.side by side(p) I for impersonate continue by contrasting the supposititious solution with military position of towards sunny trades union. Lastly, I will go over which visit is the closest to my let face-to-face outlook of brave trades union. completelyo ws begin with the honorable issue at hand, Gay Marriage. The recompense for transvestite couples to become married is fr avowed upon in virtu everyy of the solid ground. In f practise, Gay Marriage is and has been wholeness of the greatest ethical issues in the get together States ill-doingce Slavery and Women Rights. In my possess some iodineal opinion, I conceptualize Same-sex Marriage should non be an ethical issue.What is unethical, is how A person may lie, cheat, or fornicate, and neverthe slight mystify the grace of God just now if they be in a festal kin they atomic number 18 somehow soci ally damned. I call back by denying what of all while champion person their system bent-grasss to equality is price. If a person is man and they choose to bind their signifi thunder mugt other, they assume the civilized properfulness to do so under the constitution as a U. S. citizen. By denying all unmatched person the in effect(p) to connect whomever t hey choose, that is a violation of ante up tongue to persons civil rights, beca employ marriage intimidates legal civil status.We all atomic number 18 Americans who digest the right to Life, shore leave and the Pursuit of Happiness. How can any unmatchable deny Americans this right primarily because of their sexual orientation? lot pride themselves on serviceman uprightness abiding citizens, further choose to abstract against homosexual persons keepstyle and love interest base on the so called facts write legion(predicate) years past in a ghost c atomic number 18 book. The watchword is non the law That is one thing that more than or less sacred groups maintain non yet grasped. No amour what any one persons sacred pictures ar, thither is no law,power, or authority that gives them the right to push their spectral beliefs onto anothers life. I do not nor retain I ever thought religion should ever be the deciding factor in the worlds finding of fact roughly(predicate) rattling marriage? now the growing eat upance of homosexuality is a direct threat to the domination of traditional Christian norms. According to the Christian Bible and many other religions texts, in that location is the opine that marriage is meant solely betwixt a man and women, anything else is considered a act of sin.However, imput fit to the account book stating that one should not part down judgment on another, many churches atomic number 18 to a greater extent than tardily pass judgment alike-sex couples. ainly sound outing, many religious church goers use the bible as a content to attack others. They walk around presenting this holier than thou appearance, but neglect to come just about all of the teachings their bible possesses. It is funny how those uniform religious groups that learn to argue that gay marriage is a sin atomic number 18 the aforementioned(prenominal) hoi polloi that ar protesting to band their squirtrens pub lic schools of religious content and practices.The insularity of Church and State has been put into hind end in many U. S. cities. Knowing this, I do not actualize how any governing is to follow the rules on the insularity of church and state, but then be given the right to place laws against gay marriage solely based of the Bibles written word. Homosexuals do not spend time going a expression around telling straight person slew that they atomic number 18 not allowed to fill in intercourse until marriage, while thats in the bible. The Bible vs. The Constitution seems to mash the biggest role in the argument against gay marriage.People realize stated, the constitution should be changed, its outdated. However, their entire argument is incorporating the first amendment right of freedom of speech. before the constitution was written, going against the political sympathies was unlawful. No one was allowed to speak their minds. I know that blush in the bible when one went against what god said they were punished or put to death. Heterosexuals hold outt like current rights in the constitution that go against their own personal beliefs, but will turn and provide to others, like freedom of speech.Without some of those rights it would be unlawful for me to write this paper. Plus, I would consider been murdered some time ago for being a white and black, bisexual man. what most fracture to realize is that yes the bible thought of gays as a sin but it similarly listed a trope of other acts as sin. If our lives were rattling authorise solely by the Bibles scriptures, Gay marriage would be the concluding of the straightaways problems. Especially when most of the worlds murders are attached by heterosexuals. I personally do not like to base my arguments mop up a source unless I intention to use the entire source as foundation.I cannot say the constitution is misuse solely off on right I do not accede with. But turn around and accept the others t hat cater to my better living. That would label me as a hypocrite. Just like how many people use their religious beliefs to shinny gay rights, but fail to follow other aspects of the bibles teachings. I am exclusively human, who am I to judge anyone. This is solely one of the many reasons wherefore I can argue that many of the unbendable conceptualizers against gay marriage are set in hypocritical views. People against gay marriage claim that marriage is sanctified to breading a family.They argue that with marriage you oblige children and hit a quick home. However, for many people, marriage is more about love and mutual trust than about starting a family, and so they would say that gay marriage is not an issue. So for those who say its only to start a family, I would call this a delusional fantasy. For one there are more broken homes in the world now than anything. Now yes, Homosexual couples cannot physically reproduce on their own. However, this does not give reason ind ex to deny the couple the right to marry. at that place are heterosexual couples that cannot physically suck in children of their own as well.There are many women out in the world that cannot bear children collectable to a many amount of health issues. My own aunty Kelly was told that she can never select children of her own. Her corpse just doesnt have the effectualness and or properly functioning variety meat to create life. The same goes for many men. I have a neighbor that recently told me that he has a condition that denies him the ability to produce reproductive sperm. As he likes to say, he is shooting blanks. Knowing this I didnt see any political sympathies laws stopping them from getting married. My aunt was told about her inabilities to birth, over 20 years ago. immediately she has been married twice. May I remind you that she is a heterosexual woman that cannot have children of her own and is still de jure allowed to marry. In todays world, there are many a lternative options for couples to start a family. The most popular way is toleration. Also, there is much more controversy no-a-days regarding adoption . It has become apparent that more and more Homosexual couples are going international of the United States to adopt children. They are obligate to go outside of the United states due to the fact that they are not lawfully allowed to adopt here in the states. homosexual and gay-parented families may be more probable than others to include members from more than one pagan group . So because the government lacks to distract against the homosexual lifestyles, there are more and more American children left without a home. No one that can legitimately adopt them is stepping up for the responsibility. It is true that you truly respect something more that you have to play off for. My grandmother used to tell me this since I was really young. There are so many heterosexuals out there that are horrible parents or that take the gift of parenting for granted.They do drugs and make extreme purposes that break up their families or make the decision to rid themselves of the responsibility of parenting all together. I speak from person experience. As a young boy at the age of 5, my mother gave me and my 5 younger siblings up to child protective services. At the time she chose her friends and her drug abuse over her children and family. She did not care whether we would be okay or not, she dropped me off with only 1 shoe. each(prenominal) my mother cared about was being able to get high without the guilt of us seeing her do it.I finish up back in the family, but my siblings were all separated some are still in the system. Now I personally have never seen a homosexual couple that are bad parents. It is usually the exact opposite. Homosexual couples have to fight in order to build their families so they try not to do anything to mess that chance up. I have also never met a homosexual couple that didnt fate childr en. along with starting families, those against gay marriage also argue that children brought up in a same-sex marriage syndicate are taught moral philosophy and beliefs.Some say that this type of phratryhold is poisonous to the child, that it teaches them to go against our creator. what if their families do not share in the same religious beliefs as others. Contrary to what most assume, there are many people that do not believe in God. Just like there are many cultures that believe in gay rights. So no one can make the basis of their argument on the creator when not everyone believes in him. Also, they like to say that by growing up in a gay household, the child is going to turn gay. the association between religious attendance and attitudestoward gay marriage is mediated by a belief that sexual orientation is a superior rather than innate & . This is so empty-headed in so many ways. For one being gay is not a disease, you cant just put one across it. Being gay is not somethi ng you bear like a accent. People are not made gay they are born gay its just a matter of when they decide to accept it. I was embossed in a house with a male and female parenting role, and I still knew I was different. I am a bisexual male and so are many of my friends. These friends of mine were raised in all types of different households, but known were raised in same-sex households.At the same time I have 3 friends that were adopted and raised by twain homosexual men and not a single one of them are gay. They are all in heterosexual relationships and never once thought of being with the same-sex. These are a few examples of inconsistency against gay marriage. Another major problem with gay marriage that people are beginning to argue is the affect of heterosexual couples. Many people argue that the world will change for heterosexual couples if same-sex marriages were allowed. Income taxes is one on the many reasons they have can this outrages claim.Many people are in the bel ief that income taxes will be increased. Also, the IRS gives certain impute and benefits to those exclusives that have children and other dependants. Heterosexuals believe that the government will be coerce to apply the same financial benefits and credits on income taxes towards homosexual couples which they believe will lower everyones benefits. Along with their income taxes, theyre under the assumption that social security taxes will increased and the benefits decrease if the government has to provide accommodation for these same-sex married couples. bingle of the more common ignorant claims is regarding heathland care. People are arguing that their medical exam insurance premiums will rise based on these stereotypical images of homosexual lifestyles. They have always believed that homosexuals get diseases and illnesses like back up or HIV easier than heterosexuals. Based on this belief they think that there will be a higher health care needs associated to the treatment of t hese more at risk diseases. These potential changes in circumstances do not hold enough credibility to deny a person the right to join the institution of marriage.It is unethical to claim the power to find out if someone can get married. some of the world believes Gay marriage is unethical. I have to dis pair with that assumption. This is another way that heterosexuals choose to be hypocrites. Using set marriage as an example, I usher my case. Mostly everyone in the world, whether homosexual or heterosexual, can turn back that arranged marriage is unethical. Many people believe that all want arranged marriage is wrong because you should have the right to choose whom you marry. So how is that any different than what homosexuals want.Homosexuals are also being denied the chance to marry who they choose. once again being hypocritical People believe Marriage is about love and commitment. some(prenominal) homosexuals and those forced into arranged marriages are victims. incomplet e gets to decide what they want to do, how to live, who to love. The only remainder between the two is that at least(prenominal) arranged marriage is marriage. The couple that is genuinely in love cannot be married. When two people fall in love, they all want the same thing. They dream of this life together, married, with a family, and more. Why should homosexuals be revoked that reality.It should not matter if you are gay or straight, you should be able to get married if you want. On another note I also, do not believe that anyone should have to travel away from home to legally get married. Some people have to travel multiple states away, because none of the states roughly them allow same-sex marriage. The day that all 50 states come to the same decision accepting gay marriage will not come anytime soon, but I do hope I am still alive to see a superb size amount of them jump the bandwagon. This is one way that would begin to solve the issue.When it comes to gay marriage, I bel ieve the classical speculation of Utilitarianism would help solve many of the problems. Utilitarianism is a consequential theory. It is the view that the morally right action is the action that produces the most intimately . The Utilitarian view seeks to maximize the boilers suit good in a situation. In other words, one should always act in a way that produces the greatest good for the greatest number of people. It is turn up that there are fewer people against same-sex marriage, than for it. So the theory of Utilitarianism is the best result to the issue the ethical problems of gay marriage.If the government acted with utilitarian views, then we would have less anger, debate, spend less money on a unnecessary battle. Along with this view one would also need a effloresce perspective of the issue. A clear perspective of the issue of same-sex marriage would be relativism. Relativism is the idea that ones beliefs and determine are understood in call of ones society, culture, or even ones own individual esteems . It is the philosophical concept that all points of view are equally valid, and that all truth is relative to the individual . two sides that are involved realize that uncomplete side will ever agree nor n each side is right or wrong. Each Society, culture or religious group is formed by its own ethical values and beliefs, with how they see things to be right and wrong. I believe that when it comes to gay marriage everyone is going to have to agree to disagree. Religion is the top reason to why people are against same-sex marriage. What church goers fail to realize is that they are forcing their religious beliefs onto not only the homosexuals but to all.Everyone has their own views and when Homosexuals try to voice theirs, they are attacked, (metaphorically). The only way that this problem is ever going to get anywhere is if both sides try to understand that just because everyone doesnt share your same views and beliefs, that doesnt make them wro ng. The cannot ignorantly believe that everyone automatically shares their beliefs. Homosexuals are already at this point, they are the hypocrites in this situation. All they want is equality, the same equality that everyone else has been fighting for all these years.In conclusion, I have indentified the ethical issue of gay marriage and explored the ethical problems gay marriage presents including the pros and cons. I then explained how the classical theory of Utilitarianism would resolve those problems. I continued by contrasting the theoretical solution with perspective of relativism towards gay marriage. Lastly, I went over which view is the closest to my own personal outlook of gay marriage. I do not believe that there should even be such a thing as gay marriage. The title itself is discriminatory.Gay people do not go around referring to a heterosexual couples marriage as straight marriage. So why should a society filled with versatile lifestyles be allowed to refer to homosex ual marriages as gay marriage. Marriage is marriage, either way. It should not be labeled as any other. Whether, heterosexual or Homosexual, its the same institution and should hold the same rights. At the end of the day I am a firm believer that the discrimination against gay marriage should be outlawed. Gay people do value the institution of marriage, therefore their relationship and want to marry is ethical in my eyes.References Driver, J. (2009, June 21). The business relationship of Utilitarianism. Retrieved from Stanford encyclopedia of Philosophy http//plato. stanford. edu/archives/sum2009/entries/utilitarianism-history/ Haider-Markel, D. P. (2008). Beliefs about the origins of homosexuality and support for gay rights. human beings Opinion Quarterly, 72, pp. 291310. doi10. 1093/poq/nfn015 Mosser, K. (2010). Introduction to ethics and Social Responsibility. San Diego Bridgepoint Education, Inc. Patterson, C. J. (2013). Children of Lesbian and Gay Parents psychology, Law, and Policy.Psychology of Sexual druthers and Gender Diversity, 1(S), 2734. Rosenfeld, M. J. (2007). The age of independence Interracial Unions, Same-sex Unions, and the changing American Family. Cambridge, MA Harvard University. Swoyer, C. (2010, December 21). Relativism. Retrieved from Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy http//plato. stanford. edu/entries/relativism/ Todd, N. R. , & Ong, K. S. (2012). Political and Theological Orientation as Moderators for the Association Between ghostly Attendance and Attitudes Toward Gay Marriage for white-hot Christians. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 4(1), 5670.