Fighting in Hockey

Still today, there is a go on think on whether battle should be allowed or exilened in the subject area Hockey League (NHL). In generalization, most state soak up that physically scrap someone, fist-to-fist, is a negative conflict. However, in certain genetic mutations struggle is the main objective of the sport. For instance boxing, kickboxing, or the rising sport of UFC (Ultimate battle Championship). Then mess look at NHL, and point out that postulateing is not the main purpose or goal of the sport.People who turn down of the fighting also believe that getting liberate of the fights in field hockey whitethorn draw in new fans. Fans that may see this pertly constructed form of hockey as family-friendly. Although these people are trying to run the league into banning fights, there main focus as fans of the NHL, and perhaps correct the parents of the kids who play hockey, are to argue that fighting invokes a unprotected playing surround for the players, and also gives a bad national cast to the sport of hockey and the good fundamentals of sportsmanship in general.Hockey may be a full contact sport, just now many interested people believe that banning fights in hockey leads to a safer environment for jockstraps to compete in, and can also have many other benefits to the sport. Although banning fights in the NHL may have its benefits, fighting should not be eliminated from the sport of hockey in the NHL because of the tradition it upholds, the loss of fans, the fact that hockey is already physical and entertains people.So why is the solvent of hockey fights macrocosm debated in the NHL? Its mainly collectable to the concern for the safety of the athletes, who by the counseling are professionals, which means that money is involved if injury was to occur. With economics being meshed into the issue, fighting becomes a huge reason why this report is highly argued amongst the fans, players, general mangers, and even the team owners. With possible money issues and athlete injury risks on the line, why not only get rid of fighting now? EVIDENCE SECTION) In my major essay to comeback act the fact that fights can lead to money loss due to the injury of a player, I result state that many people that watch the NHL are mostly intrigued and excited by the fights. According to the National Hockey League Fans Association (NHLFA) 91% of the fans oppose the full ban of fights in NHL games (www. nhlfa. com). So with the absence of fights in the NHL, there will be a loss of fans that watch the sport on television, and also a loss in attendance of fans at the sporting event.With less people interested of the sport, and less people watching the game either at home or at the event, there will be greater economic loss to a team with less revenue and income, than just losing a player for an amount of time. another(prenominal) piece of evidence that will be brought in is the fact that fighting in hockey is a tradition. By removing f ights, you are essentially removing a part of the sport itself. I will also mention that athletes who go into the profession of hockey pull in that fighting is tolerated, and are aware of the risks.Not to mention its already a physical sport that involves a lot of risks. Back to fighting being a tradition of the NHL. Fighting has been tolerated for the NHLs history of 94 years, but I must point out that it is penalized and regulated. So fight someone at the risk of your health, and the risk of your team winning the game. Another way to look at this is that fighting adds flare to the game. Kind of deal how dunks in basketball adds flare.Essentially fighting and dunking are there to process the game more socialise for its fans/audience, which means that if its more entertaining maybe a higher fan base can be achieve. Which of course leads to more money. Its all about the money (www. hockeyhistory. org) So why did I choose this upshot and why is it an important issue? Personally I have never played hockey (competitively), but I am an avid sports fan and have seen some NHL games on T. V. I was watching ESPN one day and there was a debate on this issue between a hockey analyst and a former player and found the topic very interesting.This debate/topic is important because in the future if the rules of the game were to be changed, whether fighting be or leaves, it could drastically change the sport itself, its fan base, and may even hurt the NHL greatly in an economic sense. Bibliography http//www. usatoday. com/sports/2004-09-02-pros-cons-fighting_x. htm http//sports. espn. go. com/nhl/columns/story? columnist=buccigross_john&id=2724254 http//www. nhl. com/ meth/news. htm? id=413089 http//www. nhlfa. com/news/nr04_09_07. asp http//www. hockeyhistory. org/